Is the rise of raw chocolate a safety concern?

Raw chocolate presents a health hazard because cocoa beans are not roasted, says the NCA

The rising trend for raw chocolate may present a health hazard to consumers unless adequate steps to eliminate Salmonella are taken, says the US National Confectioners Association (NCA).

Raw chocolate is not legally defined, but manufacturers typically say their products have not been exposed to temperatures exceeding 42°C, often meaning that the cocoa beans have not been roasted. It is perceived that these conditions help to maintain healthy nutrients such as flavanols in the cocoa.

‘Salmonella concern’

But the NCA has issued a white paper that says the lack of heat treatment means Salmonella may not be killed in raw chocolate.

“NCA is concerned that finished chocolate products sold as raw may present a health hazard to consumers if a validated process is not used to destroy Salmonella,” it said.

The high temperature cocoa bean roasting process is chocolate manufacturers’ primary method to inactivate bacteria.

The trade body noted several Salmonella outbreaks in the last 30 years, including a 2001 outbreak in Germany and Denmark from chocolate products manufactured by the Storck Group, where inadequate thermal processing was blamed.

‘No more risk than raw vegetables’

The raw chocolate market in the US is still relatively niche, representing less than 1% of new products launched in 2010, according to the NCA, with the majority of products sold over the internet. But it notes that raw foodism is growing in popularity.

Tom Louvel, general manager of UK-based firm The Raw Chocolate Company, said that the risks associated with raw chocolate were overstated.

“There are lots of raw foods out there. Why is raw chocolate more subject to contamination than raw leeks or carrots?” he said.

“If you consider that thoroughly washing raw vegetables may not be enough to get rid of Salmonella in all its forms, then you end up with scenario similar to that of raw cacao i.e. there is no 99% kill procedure available as of yet. Does this mean that consumers should stop eating raw cacao and raw vegetables altogether?”

He said the company carried out batch tests to guard against the presence of Salmonella and ensured that manufacturing procedures and cleaning did not use any water in order to curtail the spread of pathogens. “There’s only so much you can do,” he said.

Killing pathogens

The NCA’s white paper said that salmonella could survive in low moisture foods and could live from months to years in chocolate.

We asked Susan Smith, executive director of chocolate at the NCA, if it was possible to make raw chocolate without roasting and still eliminate Salmonella.

“Theoretically there are a number of different ways that chocolate making processes could validate adequate killing of salmonella without roasting. Technologies used by other industries to sterilize food ingredients include irradiation and chemical treatments, though we’ve not heard of these techniques being used on cocoa.”

Smith said that the FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act preventive controls rule, would soon require all raw chocolate producers in the US to introduce preventative controls.

“Since Salmonella is an inherent risk for cocoa, once this rule goes into effect, all manufacturers will be required to have controls in place to eliminate salmonella,” she said.

Asked if the NCA statement could affect the Raw Chocolate Company’s business, Louvel said: “We will have to see the impact. It could be damaging, but we are not feeling any repercussions yet.”

“The idea is that because you process it minimally you keep the enzymes and nutrients. Research, if any, is at the embryonic stage. There are indications that there should be more, but science can’t say at the moment.” 
Tom Louvel, general manager of UK-based firm The Raw Chocolate Company

“The extent to which flavanols (and particularly biologically relevant flavanols) decrease via processing is challenging to measure because the analytical methods used to determine this vary from study to study. Many factors influence the final flavanol concentration in a product, so we cannot simply say that processing reduces flavanol content by a certain per cent.”
Susan Smith, executive director of chocolate at the NCA

Contamination at farm level

Salmonella is the primary pathogen concern for cocoa and contamination begins at farm level.

“Due to the difficulty in controlling the conditions on the farm, all raw cocoa as a commodity is considered potentially contaminated,” said the NCA’s white paper.

Cocoa beans are often left to ferment for several days in heaps covered with banana leaves in order to develop flavor. After fermentation, the beans are dried, typically in large open-air racks.

Under both procedures the beans are exposed to air, birds, insects, humans and animals, creating a risk of contamination.

“While the fermentation step may generate temperatures as high as 51.7°C (125°F), these conditions will not inactivate pathogens, if present,” said the NCA.

Related News

Lindt said only one product lot was affected

Lindt USA allergy alert for chocolate

Low-moisture foods, such as nuts, spices and peanut butter, had been considered low risk

UNL to research low-moisture food safety techniques

Atkins Chocolate Peanut Candy individual sachets were put into outer cartons of Chocolate Candies – 5 ct. sachets

Atkins Nutritionals packaging error prompts chocolate recall

Dr Schär's Twin Bar is involved in the recall

Salmonella in chocolate concern spreads across EU

Damhert Nutrition has recalled products in Netherlands and Belgium

More than 20 countries hit by chocolate wafer recall

Aust Aria's Hod Hod Halva Shekari with Pistachio

Salmonella scare forces recall for Aussie confectioner

Green & Black’s Organic Peanut and Sea Salt Milk Chocolate

Mondelez recalls Green & Blacks chocolate amid salmonella risk

Salmonella found in chocolate product at Nestlé plant, report

Comments (2)

Eric - 19 Jul 2014 | 11:55

Still

What about raw fish? Salmon is rich in both protein and fat, both of which have a protective effect on the bacteria. Seems to me that the established 'chocolate experts' are trying to find something wrong with it...

19-Jul-2014 at 23:55 GMT

Dave peters - 18 Jul 2014 | 01:13

I thought we all knew

The big difference between raw carrots and "raw chocolate" is that I can was a carrot to get any microbiological load way below what my gut can cope with. Salmonella is protected by the fat in chocolate and the infective dose is therefore very much lower - some experts have suggested that a single cell may be enough in some circumstances.

18-Jul-2014 at 13:13 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.