Confectioners rally against traffic light label proposals in France

Associations say traffic light labeling would demonize chocolate and jeopardize the French chocolate industry

Europe’s confectionery association Caobisco has backed French chocolatiers in blocking proposals for traffic light labels on food products in France.

In June, France’s health minister Marisol Touraine proposed a new public health law that included plans for a color coded nutrition labeling system.

French chocolate association, The Confédération des chocolatiers et pâtissiers de France, began its petition addressed to Tourraine on July 27, calling on the French government to scrap the bill that it claims would "paralyze the economic dynamism and creativity of French chocolatiers". The petition has so far collected over 3,500 signatures. A previous petition by medical organizations and consumer groups in support of improved food labeling collected over over 22,000 signatures, according to French newspaper Le Monde.

Why not educate instead?

The French chocolate association argued that the system would see chocolate carry red warning signs that could put consumers off a product that was not damaging to health when consumed in moderation.

“Why blacklist a particular product, rather than educate?[translation]” the petition asked.

“Such labeling will do nothing in the back obesity or diabetes because: chocolate is not fattening. Chocolates have a low glycemic index, they secrete little insulin, a hormone that promotes fat storage. The cocoa polyphenols also reduce the formation of fat cells.”

It said the proposal would damage the 4,500 French chocolate confectioners that employ nearly 15,000 people a year.

“Food professionals were not consulted nor invited to the debate and we hope for further interaction with their support before the bill is submitted to the National Assembly," it said.

Caobisco: Traffic light system ‘flawed’

The Association of Chocolate, Biscuits and Confectionery Industries of Europe (Caobisco) stands by the French artisanal chocolate makers and called traffic light labels “flawed”.

Sabine Nafziger, secretary general of the association, told ConfectioneryNews: “Our view is that nutrition information has to be factual to help the consumer make informed choices.

The UK has a voluntary front-of-pack traffic light labeling system that was adopted by Mars and Nestlé but rejected by Mondelēz. The European Commission is investigating whether the UK system is incompatible with EU law.

“Traffic lights are based on nutrient profiles. These in turn are based on fixed criteria which don’t/cannot take into account the specific circumstances of each consumer. In this sense they are flawed.”

She said that nutrition information needed to take account of differences between men and women, adults and children and active land sedentary lifestyles to enable consumers to make informed choices.

Healthy lifestyle labels an alternative option?

Nick Martin, senior vice president at Trace One, a firm that helps retailers and manufacturers develop private label and own brands, said: “Most consumers are aware that chocolate has a high level of fat and sugar and the benefits of legislation like this are likely to be outweighed by the disruption to chocolate’s image, something that would not be well received by loyal consumers.

“These customers may find information like ‘80% cocoa solids’ of more relevance to informing decisions, rather than sugar and fat contents, and it could be argued that it is more important this information is displayed on all chocolate products to maintain standards of quality.”

He said it may be more effective to encourage manufacturers to include an ‘enjoyed as part of a healthy lifestyle’ warning as research indicates that inactivity is a big cause of obesity.

Related News

Nutrition labelling alone not effective in comparison study

Front-of-pack labels are equally effective - but none works alone

UK hybrid traffic light labels show fat, saturated fat, salt and sugar, and calories front of pack

Mars and Nestlé adopt UK traffic light labels; Mondelez opts out

Traffic light-GDA combo best in UK labelling study

NCA members invited to put calories on front of pack

NCA adopts voluntary front of pack calorie labels

Comments (1)

ASX - 22 Aug 2014 | 05:24

red-lighting fat is plain wrong

First of all, fat and saturated fats, as categories, shouldn't be labelled as something bad. It's the carbs, sugar, overdose of salt, highly-processed foods with ingredients such as fructose syrup etc. that cause the majority of health and nutritional problem and it's them that people should be warned against. The point about chocolate seems valid. Those 80-90% bars, which are basically the best, would suddenly get labelled as the most harmful. But, on the other hand, if one views those labels as warnings that you shouldn't eat too much of this particular product in one day or meal it kind of makes sense. But it still doesn't help with the fact, that daily intake ratios of carbs, fat and protein are not universal.

22-Aug-2014 at 17:24 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.