Court-appointed panel split over junk food ban near schools

Court-appointed panel split over junk food ban near schools

Banning junk food near schools, one of India’s biggest and long-running public health issues, seems like it will continue some more after industry officials and health activists on a court–appointed panel were unable to forge a common direction. 

The panel of experts, which includes environmentalists, nutritionists, doctors, scientists and food industry representatives, was asked by the High Court of Delhi earlier this year to analyse the harmful effects of junk food—defined as foods that are high in fat, or sugar or salt—and recommend guidelines for quality and safety in food made available to students in school canteens.

Onus on student

In its draft guidelines, both sides have been unable to agree on the need to completely ban food items commonly categorised as junk food in and around 500 metres of school grounds. 

According to media reports, food industry representatives had suggested an indicative list of recommended food in schools, and were not keen to toe the other’s line on a complete ban on junk food, as demanded by the other side.

Moreover, food industry officials put their weight behind an “eat less/eat just right/eat judiciously,” policy under which the onus is on the students to be careful of how much and what they consume in school canteens.

The food industry side also suggested improving the wholesomeness of foods made available in schools and setting up school health teams, which can ensure the quality and safety of food made available to students.

All in the air

The other side, however, contested their arguments and pointed out that the HC order was clear in terms of it expressing concern over the ill effects of junk food in dietary habits of school kids.

They also questioned the feasibility of implementing and monitoring guidelines proposed by the industry players, arguing that it will be virtually impossible to monitor the conversion of unhealthy junk food to healthy food.

The “healthy” side also penned in the report that the industry representatives had failed to mention or acknowledge the rising incidence of obesity in children and its direct correlation to junk food. 
Both sides are also divided on the importance of exercise for children to offset the ill effects of junk food—while industry officials propagated more exercise, the other side argued that no amount of exercise can negate problems due to overeating. 

Experts on the other side also attacked the policy of eating right/eating judiciously propagated by food industry representatives saying that it suffered from a lack of clarity and is very open-ended. 

Never-ending tussle

It was in 2010 that the court recommended banning the sale of junk foods in school, but

said nothing about junk foods on-sale near schools hearing a public interest litigation case originally filed by a Delhi-based NGO Uday Foundation.

The foundation had asked for the sale of junk food and aerated drinks to be outlawed in schools as well as within a 500-metre radius.

But in 2011, in what was a last-minute move, the Delhi High Court received a plea from the All India Food Processors Association asking to be heard out before passing any order on the ban.

However, in 2012, India’s food agency indicated it would follow guidance from a local court to restrict their availability around schools. In a reply to the Delhi High Court, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India said then it had heeded the court’s direction to formulate the standards on quality and safe food in schools.

The same court gave the FSSAI a period of six months to frame standards on the sale of junk food and aerated drinks in and around educational institutions in the country, which were expected by Mar 22, 2013 from the panel.

Related News

Scientists link poor pre-pregnancy diet with premature birth

Scientists link poor pre-pregnancy diet with premature birth

Court declares nutraceutical prior-approval advisory ‘unlawful’

Court declares nutraceutical prior-approval advisory ‘unlawful’

Sporty kids being bombarded with junk food ads in New Zealand

Sporty kids being bombarded with junk food ads in New Zealand

Government groups target healthy food for India’s school canteens

Government groups target healthy food for India’s school canteens

Indian mums: ‘Ghee is good, refined is righteous and butter is better’

Indian mums: ‘Ghee is good, refined is righteous and butter is better’

Junk food can junk your memory in a week, suggests new study

Junk food can junk your memory in a week, suggests new study

Related Products

See more related products

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.