No commercial reason not to cut sugar in confectionery, says chairman

Action on Sugar: Campaign forms to cut sugar in confectionery

Action on Sugar calls on confections to produce smaller products with less sugar

A new campaign group headed by medical professionals says the food industry can improve profit margins while cutting ‘unnecessary’ added sugar from products, which it says is responsible for rising global obesity.

Action on Sugar, launched today, was setup by those behind the Consensus Action on Salt and Health (CASH). It will pressure the UK government to encourage manufacturers to set four-year targets to gradually reduce sugar in brands by 30-40%.

“There’s no commercial reason why they shouldn’t do it,” chairman of the new group, Graham MacGregor, professor of Cardiovascular Medicine at the Wolfson Institute told ConfectioneryNews.

“Taking out sugar will make products cheaper to produce. We don’t want substitution, just take it out.”

Action on Sugar favors downsizing products over replacing sugar with other sweeteners.

Concerned by sugar levels in confectionery

“It’s obviously a problem. Everyone is aware of sugar in confectionery, but not about the large amounts of sugar in products,” said MacGregor.

The guideline daily amount (GDA) for sugar in the UK is 90 g for women, 120 g for men and 85 g for children aged 5-10 years.

A standard UK Mars bar contains 229 kcal and 30.4 g of sugar, which accounts for 36% of a child’s GDA for sugar.

Cutting calories to curb obesity

Sugar accounts for about 30-40% of calories in chocolate, while the rest comes from fat – the main source of which is milk fat in milk chocolate and cocoa butter.

 “If you reduce caloric intake, you reduce obesity. The reason why we are getting fat is that we are eating so many calories,” said MacGregor.

Calorie reduction pledge ‘ineffective’

The UK government’s Responsibility Deal includes a calorie reduction pledge that has been signed by leading confectioners such as Mars, Mondelez International and Nestlé.

“The calorie pledge has had no effect whatsoever on caloric intake,” said MacGregor. He pointed to a study by Panjwani and Caraher from City University London that said the UK’s calorie reduction pledge was fundamentally flawed because it relied on industry taking voluntary actions to prioritize public health interests above their own.

Taste implications

Mars UK recently said it had gone as far it could to reformulate Mars and Snickers bars without compromising taste.

“If you do it slowly, people’s taste receptors adjust,” said MacGregor, adding that few consumers complained when UK manufacturers reduced salt levels based on yearly targets.

If Mars took a further 30% of sugar from a Mars bar, the size would go from 51 g to around 42 g. In short, with a 30% sugar reduction, chocolate would get much smaller.

No-brainer?

When Mars UK reduced the size of Mars and Snickers bars to reduce calories it kept the same 51p ($0.83) price.

“It would be better not to reduce the price because we don’t want to increase consumption,” said MacGregor.

He said that manufacturers could feasibly reduce sugar as well as the recommended retail price and still improve profit margins.

But if it’s as simple as taking out sugar to make smaller bars and watching your profits soar, why haven’t companies done it already?

“It isn’t taste. It’s just that nobody has told them to do it. The food industry is very conservative and doesn’t think about these things,” said the group’s chair.

“The brilliance of the policy is that it gets to people who are more deprived, who don’t listen to health messages.”

Sugar in leading brands

Product

pack size (g)

serving size (g)

sugar per portion (g)

teaspoons of sugar per portion (4g/teaspoon) 

kcal per portion

Mars chocolate bar

51 g

51 g

30.4 g

8

230 kcal

Cadbury Double Decker Chocolate Bar 

54.5 g

54.5 g 

30 g

8

250 kcal

Nestlé Aero Bubbly Chocolate Bars, Peppermint Mint

40 g

40 g

24.9 g

6

221 kcal

Nestlé Rowntree's Jelly Tots, Fruit Sugar Sweets Sharing Bag

160 g

12 sweets

6.9 g

2

40 kcal

Related News

Don’t overlook reformulation to reduce sugar in chocolate, says Barry Callebaut innovation manager

Sugar under siege: Reformulation can win the battle, says Barry Callebaut

Study finds no link between childhood candy eating and obesity later in life.

Childhood candy consumption not to blame for later health risks: NCA backed study

Chocolate and sweets exiled but Wrigley's gum survives Lidl checkout cull. Photo credit: The Consumerist

Candy cast out: Lidl goes confectionery-free at UK checkouts

Scientists have linked added sugars to obesity, type two diabetes, heart disease and tooth decay, but the candy industry says the commodity is being unfairly demonized. Photo Credit: The Health Guardians

Confectionery industry prepares to battle its sugar demons

A spoonful of sugar less could aid public health, but might it also put consumers off? Better not to tell them, says Euromonitor

‘Stealth reduction’ the best option for sugar in confectionery: Euromonitor

The prices of fresh fruit and vegetables, rather than canned or frozen, seem to be a driving factor behind increased BMI in children, say researchers.

High cost of fruit and vegetables linked to higher body fat in young children: Study

Mondelēz sets 'uncommunicated' sugar limits on new products, but will only consider a sugar reduction pledge if WHO revises its guidance

Mondelēz: ‘We may revisit sugar reduction target’, if WHO formalizes guidance

The confectionery industry hope to build its case for candy as part of a healthy diet by funding research, but could its findings be questioned by a skeptical public?

‘Skepticism’ towards industry-funded sugar and calories research, says NCA

CAOBISCO has urged the World Health Organization to consider a 2010 EFSA opinion before halving recommended sugar intake

‘Scientific substantiation’ needed before WHO reduces sugar guidance, says CAOBISCO

Inulin supplier says the ingredient could hold fibre content bragging rights for confectioners

Have you considered inulin in your chocolate?

US confectioners worried sensitive formulation information may be leaked when the FDA measures added sugars in candy

Added sugar labeling could compromise trade secrets, says NCA

Adding a reduced or no sugar brand extension allows confectioners to test the market before removing a higher calorie product, says Cargill

Reduced or no sugar SKUs help confectioners cut calories without risk

'Light in calories' chocolate requires drastic changes to the formulation

Significant changes required for ‘light in calories’ chocolate

Plum ingredients can improve the nutritional profile and reduce sugar in chocolate and other confectionery applications, claims Sunsweet

Could plum be the new color of confectionery?

What are the best options for replacing sugar in chocolate confectionery?

A bittersweet symphony for alternative sweeteners in chocolate

Better sugar understanding is needed for sugar-free chocolate success

Sweet alternatives: Better sugar understanding is needed for sugar-free chocolate success, say researchers

Can chocolate be healthy and indulgent?

Healthy indulgence: What’s possible in chocolate reformulation?

Related Products

See more related products

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.