Oxfam sustainability scorecard reveals ‘leaders and laggards’

Oxfam sustainability scorecard reveals ‘leaders and laggards’

Leading food and drink makers including Nestlé, Unilever and Coca-Cola have made good progress in the year since Oxfam released its first Behind the Brands sustainability scorecard – and only one company made no progress, according to the NGO.

General Mills was singled out as the only company to have made no progress in its sustainability initiatives since the original report was released last February.

The 2013 report assessed the sustainability initiatives of ten of the world’s biggest food and drink companies, including Nestlé, Unilever, Danone, Mondelez, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. All fared poorly, with Nestlé topping the list with a score of 38/70 in seven categories: Treatment of workers, women, farmers, land and water, as well as climate and a grade for overall transparency.

Nestlé’s score has since shifted seven points to 45/70, and retains its top position on the scorecard, while General Mills has lost a point, replacing Associated British Foods at bottom of the table, with a score of 15/70. ABF moved from 13/70 to 19/70. Unilever made the biggest improvement, up from 34/70 to 44/70, and Coca-Cola, in third place, improved nine points to reach 38/70.

‘Race to the top’

“Most of the ‘Big 10’ are moving in the right direction because hundreds of thousands of consumers and investors controlling trillions in assets are demanding an overhaul to business as usual,” said Oxfam International executive director Winnie Byanyima.

“Some companies showed courageous leadership but it appears others need to be pulled along kicking and screaming. It will take time for them to reverse a 100-year history of relying on cheap land and labour to make mass products at huge profits but at high social and environmental costs. The race to the top is underway and there are clear leaders and laggards.”

Among specific improvements, seven of the companies signed up to the UN Women’s Empowerment Principles in the past year, while six put policies in place to ensure local communities are consulted and give consent before the land they are using is sold. Eight companies improved their climate policies, and the three biggest cocoa companies – Nestlé, Mondelez and Mars – have said they will address gender inequality in their supply chains in a plan due to be finalised by May.

Knock-on effect

Byanyima said: “The most important lesson from the first year of ‘Behind the Brands’ is that companies do respond, quickly and to great effect, when consumers push them toward more responsible methods of production. Down the supply chains we are already seeing agricultural producers and traders beginning to improve their practices to ensure they retain the business of the ‘Big 10’.”

Responding to the report, General Mills said in a statement that it was strongly focused on sustainability and it felt its efforts deserved a stronger score.

“We are working to conserve and protect the resources upon which our business depends around the world, and we continue to improve our products and practices broadly across our supply chain," it said. "Transparency is key, of course, and we regularly report our progress in our annual Global Responsibility Report.  Our report tends not to mirror the Oxfam scorecard, and because the scorecard is based only on publicly available information, that may be a key factor in their ranking."

Nestlé touted its 8/10 score for its efforts to combat climate change, and its better-than-average performance on workers’ rights, transparency and water policy.

“Nestlé has supported the efforts of Oxfam and other NGOs in their efforts to make progress towards a sustainable food system while making clear its belief that cooperation between civil society, government and business is the best way to bring this about,” it said.


This article has been updated to include a response from General Mills.

Related News

Oxfam's sustainability scorecard: Spurring a race to the top for the food industry

Oxfam's sustainability scorecard: Spurring a race to the top for the food industry

Nestlé focuses on healthy reduction in commitments review

Nestlé focuses on healthy reduction in commitments review

Cakes, brownies and muffins contain plenty of sugar that bakers should consider sourcing in a sustainable manner, says Fair Trade USA

Fair Trade USA: Sustainable sugar should be a priority for bakers

Dr Bernhard Url: "EFSA in 2014 does not have a problem with conflict of interest, but with perceived conflicts of interest.”

New EFSA chief-designate: ‘Our first priority is to get the science right’

Oxfam climate change report: General Mills says it has been 'mischaracterized' and Kellogg defends its environmental commitments

General Mills and Kellogg refute Oxfam climate change attack

General Mills opens Shanghai development centre to boost China market

General Mills spends big on Asian product development

Oxfam welcomes General Mills climate change policy revamp: 'Political leaders and others in the industry should take note'

Oxfam praises ‘bold’ climate change move from General Mills

Kellogg's climate change pledge has gone 'slightly beyond' what General Mills announced in two areas, Oxfam says

Oxfam: Kellogg rises above General Mills on climate change

NGO accuses EU company of illegal African land grabs

NGO accuses EU company of illegal African land grabs

"The global food system remains broken," said Oxfam, although it notes increased willingness to tackle social and environmental issues among the top 10 food firms

Oxfam: World’s biggest food companies must ‘walk the talk’ on sustainability

© iStock/bieshutterb

What are the sustainable scores on the board? Who cares?

Unilever and Nestlé biggest improvers in Oxfam sustainability report

Unilever and Nestlé biggest improvers in Oxfam sustainability report

Women small-scale farmers in Africa own just 1% of agricultural land, but make up 60% of the global agricultural workforce. Photo credit: Rainforest Alliance

Oxfam confronts Mondelez, Nestlé and Mars over women’s rights on cocoa farms

Oxfam thanks food industry for ‘bland’ and ‘complacent’ response to damning CSR report

Oxfam thanks food industry for ‘bland’ and ‘complacent’ response to damning CSR report

Unilever & Nestlé tell Oxfam to bring other stakeholders to food ethics table

Unilever & Nestlé tell Oxfam to bring other stakeholders to food ethics table

ABF calls Oxfam food ethics attack ‘ridiculous’

ABF calls Oxfam food ethics attack ‘ridiculous’

Comments (1)

Juan Francisco Mollinedo - 27 Feb 2014 | 08:03

Shame on Oxfam

It is sad to see how politics play an important (and dirty) role in the day-to-day activities of many succesful food businesses. This NGO plays the same role as the Catholic Church in Inquisition times looking for ·heretics· amongst the international community. It is interesting to note that Oxfam only focus its attention in big business that are easily identified by the consumer and easy prey for them. SME's are of no interest at all to this organization. Soon Oxfam will see its downfall in a similar way like the Ucranian and Venezuelan governments. Is just a matter of time. We are already seing the first signs of this with the Scarlett Johansson affair.

27-Feb-2014 at 08:03 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.