Hershey defends Reese’s and York in trademark war

Hershey accuses firm of infringing Reese’s trademark by importing Toffee Crisp

Hershey has filed a lawsuit against LBB Imports accusing it of infringing multiple trademarks on products such as Reese’s and York by importing similar brands into the US such as Toffee Crisp and Yorkie.

It brought a case in a district court in Pennsylvania, calling on LBB Imports to stop importing Toffee Crisp, Yorkie, Maltesers, Cadbury, Kit Kat and Rolo into the US. It claimed the products infringed Hershey’s trademarks on Reese’s, York, Malteser, Cadbury and Rolo.

“In particular, the imported Toffee Crisp product sold by LBB closely resembles the well-known Reese’s  trade dress that is protected by a number of federal trademark registrations: among other things, both have the same orange background color, and both feature a slanted yellow font with brown outlining,” said Hershey in its filing.

Licensed brands

Hershey is also seeking damages and an injunction to stop LBB Imports bringing in Kit Kat, Rolo and Cadbury products that are manufactured by the original producers, Nestlé and Mondelēz.

Hershey manufactures Kit Kat and Rolo under license from Nestlé, as well as some of Mondelēz International’s Cadbury products such as Dairy Milk and Creme Egg. It holds US trademarks for each of these brands.

We asked Hershey why it didn't ask Nestle and Mondelēz to talk to their customer to ensure these products were not brought in to the US.

"This is a case of illegal grey marketing and we do not know LBB's sources for acquiring these products.  The most effective way to stop these infringing imports is to directly confront the infringing party," said Jeff Beckman, director of corporate communications at Hershey.

Malteser turf wars

Hershey also hopes to block LBB from importing Mars’ Maltesers into the US.

Hershey produces its own Malteser brand and holds a US trademark for ‘Malteser’. In April this year, Mars, which produces Maltesers - with an ‘s’ - brought a court case against Hershey in Virginia, accusing it of passing off products as Mars’ Maltesers.

"Hershey clearly owns the Malteser trademark in the United States and has owned the mark for 17 years.  Malteser been a U.S. trademark since the 1960s when the Leaf company first registered the mark long before we acquired it," said Beckman.

York versus Yorkie

In the current case, Hershey also accused LBB imports of infringing its trademark on peppermint pattie brand ‘York’ by importing Nestlé’s Yorkie. It claimed that the names were similar enough to cause confusion among consumers.

"We own York trademark name for any type of confection in the United States. Any confection with that name or a confusingly similar name is a simply an infringement of our registered trademark," said Beckman.

Hershey added in its court filing: “What is more, defendant continues to import and sell the Infringing Products, despite previously admitting that its actions infringed Hershey’s trademark rights and repeatedly agreeing to stop its infringing conduct."

We asked LBB Imports if it plans to fight the case and are awaiting a response.

Hershey has called for a jury trial to decide the case.

Related News

Hofstra University law professor says Pepperidge Farm will struggle to prove similarities in Trader Joe's trademark lawsuit. Photo: iStock - alexskopje

Pepperidge Farm unlikely to succeed in Trader Joe’s cookie ‘copying’ lawsuit, says academic

Hershey’s and Mars drop trademark infringement case

TinctureBelle produces cannabis-laced edible products such as Hashees Peanut Butter Cups

Hershey takes pot candy firm to ‘high’ court

Mars says Hershey's Malteser brand (pictured) is trying to pass itself off as Mars' Maltesers - claims Hershey denies.

Hershey ‘tricking US consumers with fake Maltesers’, claims Mars

Comments (2)

Ugatta B. Kidding - 03 Sep 2014 | 04:16

Stupidy is correct...by LBB and Yourself EDB...

It doesn't matter that the Yorkie isn't a peppermint patty...You CAN'T use another trademarked or wordmark of another brand inside your product! They don't even have to be in same category! It also doesn't matter about the cocoa content of UK chocolate, Hersey's has a contract to make Kit Kat in the US from Nestle, they cant undercut that contract by allowing importation of product of the exact same name! I don't work for Hersey (actually a competitor), but IP infringement like this must stop. LBB should get hammered!

03-Sep-2014 at 16:16 GMT

EDB - 02 Sep 2014 | 05:59

confusion, greed, or stupidity

OH my, how can you confuse a York PEPPERMINT pattie with a chocolate bar? reaching here. I see the connection,of the toffee, score now 1-1. Kit Kat is a tie. It has a license to make kit kat, which is granted from the owner of Kit kat. Hard to know if this will stand up. The imported bar is not a knock off of a Hershey product. BTW..are they really the same?? Milk chocolate in the UK has higher cocoa content. Does Hershey actually make it the same way here??

02-Sep-2014 at 17:59 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.