‘Stealth reduction’ the best option for sugar in confectionery: Euromonitor

A spoonful of sugar less could aid public health, but might it also put consumers off? Better not to tell them, says Euromonitor

Confectioners should keep quiet about sugar reduction or risk irritating consumers, according to analysts at Euromonitor International.

In a recent podcast, the research organization said that it expected confectionery to be one of the main targets for calls to reduce sugar as it was widely associated with high levels among consumers.

Low-profile reduction

Lauren Bandy, ingredients analyst at Euromonitor, said: “It seems unlikely that manufacturers will launch low sugar variants again, simply because consumer demand would be low.”

She pointed to reduced sugar products launched by Cadbury’s, Kit Kat and Haribo in the UK several years ago that were pulled due to low sales.

 “Stealth reduction might be a better option for confectionery players,” she said.

Sugar in Confectionery

2.3m metric tons of sugar and bulk sweeteners were consumed in confectionery in 2013. The average consumer in Western Europe spent $120 on confectionery, equating to around 7.5 kilos of sugar, more than half of which was chocolate confectionery. Source: Euromonitor International.

Diana Cowland, health and wellness analyst at Euromonitor, added: “Stealth reduction for foods is the best way for manufacturers to retain their consumer base as consumers are for the most part unaware the recipe has changed – particularly as better-for-you products are less appealing due to the fact they are considered to have less flavor.”

Is ‘stealth reduction’ underhanded?

Sugar came under the spotlight at the start of the year after the group behind Consensus Action on Salt and Health (CASH) setup Action on Sugar, a group urging manufacturers to reduce sugar in products by 30-40% in the next three to five years.

‘Stealth’ is not a term favored by the campaign as it says it has negative connotations.  Katharine Jenner, campaign director for Action on Sugar and CASH, told this site that the health world would recognize the strategy as “unobtrusive reductions for the betterment of health”.

“In our view, it is up to manufacturers to decide how to communicate any improvements to their food, they know their customers better than we do. “

Industry View

The US National Confectionery Association (NCA) argues that sugar is being unfairly demonized. The industry body recently said that its members would not reformulate products en mass as confections could fit into a healthy lifestyle. It aims to educate consumers how to enjoy confectionery in moderation.

“The salt reduction campaign has, however, been so successful because the salt has been unobtrusively removed, meaning customers don't have to read the labels and make a choice to eat less salt. Our view has always been these if people don't like their food with less salt, they can always add it back in - whereas they can't take it out.”

Euromonitor: Better-for-you switches off most consumers

Euromonitor analyst Diana Cowland said that if the UK’s salt reduction strategies were used as a reference, then products communicating reduced content put off consumers. Reduced salt packaged food in the UK recorded a constant value compound annual growth rate (CAGR) decline of 1.8% from 2008 to 2013 – equivalent to a £7m ($11.7m) loss.

Bandy said: “The problem with removing sugar from confectionery is that it can lose its taste and texture, the factors that make the product indulgent and the ultimate reason why consumers buy confectionery in the first place.”

Related News

Mondelēz sets 'uncommunicated' sugar limits on new products, but will only consider a sugar reduction pledge if WHO revises its guidance

Mondelēz: ‘We may revisit sugar reduction target’, if WHO formalizes guidance

“Our comparison between brands and supermarkets within cheese types suggests that brand-led companies are not reducing salt content as much," says Kawther Hashem of  Consensus Action on Salt and Health (CASH).

Big brands must step up to salt challenge, says CASH

Adding a reduced or no sugar brand extension allows confectioners to test the market before removing a higher calorie product, says Cargill

Reduced or no sugar SKUs help confectioners cut calories without risk

Confectionery packaging declines 1% to reach 12.8 billion units

Confectionery packaging declines 1% to reach 12.8 billion units in 2015

© iStock/bogdandreava

A 20% sugar cut by 2020? ‘It won’t be possible,’ says FDF

Government body suggests confectionery portion size reduction is the way forward, as there is "limited scope for reformulation" in the category. ©iStock/Tverdohlib

UK sets portion size and sugar reduction guidance for chocolate and candy

Confectioners should favor a scientific apporach to meeting sugar reduction targets, says Leatherhead Food Research's head of microscopy. ©iStock/Povareshka

How to reduce sugar scientifically and creatively in confectionery

Action on Sugar calls on confections to produce smaller products with less sugar

Action on Sugar: Campaign forms to cut sugar in confectionery

Confectionery has been a big growth category for stevia in Europe

Stevia in Europe: PureCircle highlights emerging trends

Stevia is a green plant orginating from the border area between Paraquay and Brazil

Stevia: The Holy Grail or fail for chocolate?

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.